Tropedia

  • Before making a single edit, Tropedia EXPECTS our site policy and manual of style to be followed. Failure to do so may result in deletion of contributions and blocks of users who refuse to learn to do so. Our policies can be reviewed here.
  • All images MUST now have proper attribution, those who neglect to assign at least the "fair use" licensing to an image may have it deleted. All new pages should use the preloadable templates feature on the edit page to add the appropriate basic page markup. Pages that don't do this will be subject to deletion, with or without explanation.
  • All new trope pages will be made with the "Trope Workshop" found on the "Troper Tools" menu and worked on until they have at least three examples. The Trope workshop specific templates can then be removed and it will be regarded as a regular trope page after being moved to the Main namespace. THIS SHOULD BE WORKING NOW, REPORT ANY ISSUES TO Janna2000, SelfCloak or RRabbit42. DON'T MAKE PAGES MANUALLY UNLESS A TEMPLATE IS BROKEN, AND REPORT IT THAT IS THE CASE. PAGES WILL BE DELETED OTHERWISE IF THEY ARE MISSING BASIC MARKUP.

READ MORE

Tropedia
Advertisement
WikEd fancyquotesQuotesBug-silkHeadscratchersIcons-mini-icon extensionPlaying WithUseful NotesMagnifierAnalysisPhoto linkImage LinksHaiku-wide-iconHaikuLaconic

The viewpoint character chats with another character, often a friend or associate, whose ideas seem almost too outlandish to believe. Nevertheless, the seeming crackpot is actually Mr. Exposition and will be vindicated by the story. The exposition doesn't need to be of any practical use to its hearer; its main purpose is to make the strange happenings in the story easier to understand and more plausible for the reader.

  • Type One: After explaining the theoretical background the character proceeds to give evidence. The evidence may be a material object or a story about how he learned what he now knows, for which the discussion is a Framing Device.
  • Type Two: After the explanation, the character proceeds to test out his theory in practice. The experiment will provide results, but may turn out to be more dangerous than the character expected.
  • Type Three: After the explanation, the hearer proceeds to bump into the evidence by sheer coincidence.

Compare Lecture as Exposition, Chekhov's Classroom, and Opening Narration. The inverse of We Have Been Researching Phlebotinum for Years.

Examples of Theory Before Phenomenon include:


Literature[]

  • The White People by Arthur Machen. Ambrose has strange ideas about the nature of true sin as violation of the laws of nature and lends the main character a manuscript written by a girl who had supernatural experiences.
  • The Devotee of Evil by Clark Ashton Smith. The main character becomes an acquaintance with a man who believes evil to be an universal force and is developing a mechanism to show it in practice.
  • The Tomb-Spawn by Clark Ashton Smith. A story-teller tells the main characters of an ancient wizard-king and his tomb and how the tomb has been prophesied to be found accidentally. The main characters' later experiences show that the story-teller was perfectly accurate.
  • Eloi Eloi Lama Sabachthani by William Hope Hodgson. The narrator's friend believes in the historicity of the Gospel narrative and prepares an experiment to show that the darkness when Jesus was crucified is both scientifically possible and proof of Jesus's exceptional soul.
  • The Derelict by William Hope Hodgson. A ship's doctor talks about a mystical life-force and then continues to give an account about a living derelict.
  • "The Time Machine"


Western Animation[]


Real Life[]

Advertisement